»TFG Briefing Note on Proposed CA AB 32 Regulations

»Brazil’s Emerging Sectoral Framework for Reducing
Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation

»The Oslo Climate and Forest Conference
Interim REDD+ Partnership Adopted May 27, 2010

»REDD+ in the Post-Copenhagen World: Recommendations for Interim Public Finance

»Borneo Clouded Leopard Conservation Update

»REDD Reality-check: The challenges of putting potential into practice in Africa

»COP15 REDD+ Facilitator, Tony La Vina, Proposes Way Forward

»Change. Hope. Tropical Forests.

» Source and Sink: One Year. A Poet’s Perspective on a Year of Tropical Deforestation.

» TFG paper explores the range of private sector financial tools to conserve tropical forests

»Governors Sign Historic Deforestation Accord

» Re-Energizing REDD

»The Problem: Tropical Deforestation

» The Solution: REDD

» As World Steps Forward to Help Save Tropical Forests, US Retreats

» To Bali in 21 sets of Brackets

» Coral Reefs

»Trees Make Delegates see REDD

»Victory Lap

» A History of Climate Change and Tropical Forest Negotations

» Carbon Karma

»High Speed, Low Drag
Conservation

» Interview With Salil Shetty

» Soy You Wanna Be An Environmentalist

» Interview With Elsa Esquivel Bazan

» TFCA

 

 

Re-Energizing REDD¬†                                                         September 26,2008

 

Since Montreal (2005), and Bali (2007), REDD progress has been superficially rapid (lots of excitement) but scant on detail. Since the Montreal COP11 decision, After two and half years of excitement and concerted diplomacy, there are still no specific details about how REDD will work through the UNFCCC. From a conservation perspective, the following three UNFCCC REDD decisions are needed to ensure there will be early and fungible REDD credits as part of any post-2012 agreement.

1) Establish REDD Base Periods at COP14 (Poznan)
The most valuable decision Parties can make is to firmly establish a specific past timeframe for evaluating REDD baselines. Establishing firm past timeframes is critical, because it gives countries the confidence to begin reducing deforestation now without waiting for a final post-2012 package. Prior meetings have stressed the importance of using historical baselines, or interval,s but no decision has been firmly made.

Otherwise, with no firm date set, countries might worry that negotiations would lead to a future baseline, e.g., from 2008 to 2012. Any baseline that is set in the future would provide a disincentive for countries to stop deforestation now. The perverse reasoning would be that by allowing rates of deforestation to temporarily rise, a country could claim higher rates of current emissions, and hence more future emission reductions. Everyone agrees this is environmentally a bad idea, and everyone agrees countries should begin reducing deforestation now. But until a decision about baseline years is made at the UNFCCC, uncertainty reigns.

 

2) Constitute REDD Executive Board
Coming soon.

3) Invite Developing Countries to Establish RNAs
Coming soon.